Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Monika Halan's blog

Hand's-free money management

Monika Halan's blog

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • About
  • TV Shows

Tag Archives: LIC

A giant will walk into Dalal Street. But there are internal road blocks.

Posted on February 5, 2021 by monikahalan
Reply
Photo by Max Fischer on Pexels.com

The number of policyholders is 30 crore. Assets under management are Rs 27.6 lakh crore (to see this in context, understand that the annual budget of India for FY 22 is Rs 34.8 lakh crore). An annual premium pipeline of Rs 3.4 lakh crore. A household name that for decades has meant life insurance in India. When such a behemoth goes to market, there are bound to be concerns, worries and plenty of politics. The drama has just begun.

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) disinvestment should finally happen in 2021-22. I say this with confidence because the background work is now done and the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) has put in the amendments to the 1956 LIC Act (you can see them in the Finance Bill 2021) that will clear the decks for a stake sale by the government, who is today a 100% owner. The 318-page Finance Bill 2021 has 75 pages devoted to rewriting the 22-page 1956 LIC Act.

There are six big take-aways from the amendments to the LIC Act. And then there are some concerns. The take-aways first.

One, the basic constitution of the entity will be changed by changing Section 4 of the 1956 Act. The new rules make the corporation aligned to Companies Act 2013. There will be 15 board members, with one place kept for a woman. Additionally, insurance agents, intermediaries or anybody working for another insurance firm anywhere in the world cannot be a director on the board. An upto 10% owner can have one board seat, between 10 and 25% shares can have two seats and more than 25% can have three seats. The rest belong to the government and there are rules in place as to how these will get filled.

Two, Section 5 has been amended so that the capital of LIC will now reflect its size and has been hiked from the current Rs 5 crore to Rs 25,000 crore, split into 2,500 crore shares of Rs 10 each. There are provisions for partly paid up, preference shares, for bonus and rights issues and for private placement. Embedded into the new Act will be the provision that LIC will always have the government as the majority shareholder and will not disinvest more than 49% shares. But there is a glide path for this. The initial sale can only be upto 25% of the shares. It is only after five years of this can the government sell more of its shares. This means that for five years after the first disinvestment, the government will continue to hold 75% stake. After five years, it can disinvest such that it still has a 51% share. This is important because Section 37 has been left unchanged. This section says that the sum assured by all policies issued by LIC, including any bonuses are guaranteed in cash by the Central Government. So, policyholders need not worry on this count.

If shares are sold at a premium to the face value (and they will of course get a hefty premium), it will be kept in a share premium account. This money will be used for future bonus shares to shareholders, for the payment of costs of the IPO and for the discount to policyholders on the shares they buy and for future buy backs on own shares and other shares. So potentially the premium money can be used to buy shares in other firms.

Three, existing policyholders of LIC to get shares at a 10% discount for upto 10% of the issue size. For example, if the government disinvests 10% of its 2,500 crore shares, then the shares available for policyholders will be 25 crore out of the 250 crore shares that make 10% of the shares to be disinvestment. Policyholders will not get an allotment of a value more than Rs 2 lakh. This can go upto Rs 5 lakh in case the reserved part of the shares are undersubscribed. What I understand is that a person with multiple policies (many people have 20-30 policies) will not be able to get allotment per policy, but one demat account will facilitate shares to be sold on any one policy of the policyholder. Expect the demat account openings to skyrocket.

Four, the two-line Section 24 on “Funds of the Corporation” is replaced with a 6-page detailed list of how LIC will have to segregate its funds. LIC will now have to segregate its pool of funds into a participating fund and a non-participating fund. I have written earlier on how to understand par and non par products and their pools here. Currently the money goes into one pot, though there is some form of segregation, but it is not water-tight. LIC has one year (there is a carve out for a three-year glide path to create this) after the disinvestment to split the common pool into two. Receipts and payments will be made from the respective pools. Today there is a cross subsidization possible between two very different products. But an escape door has been given in Section 24B(9) that says: that the government can exempt LIC from complying with the provisions of this section in “public interest”. Basically, if the unions agitate too much, they will go back on the clean-up. Or if they find something really unexpected when the pools of funds are opened up, there is an exit door that can be used to get out of this. This is a key part of the disinvestment process since investors coming in will not want to buy into an opaque pool. The government must not go back on pool segregation.

Five, the three-para Section 26 is being replaced with much tighter rules on what will be audited. For example, auditors will now have specific oversight on the lending book of LIC. Auditors will now be able to have oversight on whether loans made have been properly secured, whether the terms are in favour of LIC (this is to take care of conflicted lending, if any), if securities have been sold for less than they were bought, if loans and advances have been shown as deposits, if personal expenses have been charged to the revenue account. 

Six, Section 28 has been replaced. Section 28 says that a minimum of 95% of the surplus is to be shared with policyholders. This will change to 90% after the amendment. Till the LIC fund is split into par and non par, the sharing is 90% of the entire fund. 10% of the surplus will be kept in a special fund or moved to reserves – this will be a board decision.

Once the par and non par pools are split (there is a window of three years to do this), then, a minimum of 90% of the surplus is given to (or reserved for) par policyholders. A maximum of 10% goes to shareholders in a reserve fund or any other way that the board decides. 100% of the surplus of the non-par fund will be given to the shareholders – in a reserve fund or a separate account – to be decided by the board. Policyholders in a non par product by definition do not share in the profits, but get a guaranteed return, therefore there is no sharing of the surplus. Currently there is little visibility on which policyholder is paying for whose surplus.

This surplus can be used for declaring and/or paying dividend, issue of bonus shares. The amendment also prevents the payout of dividend from any unrealized profits, notional gains (remember UTI?), revaluation of assets.

Concerns

It seems that just getting a base level of hygiene amendments was very tough. From my experience of serving in Swarup Committee (2009) and Bose Committee (2015) and dealing with LIC in particular and insurance industry in general, breaking through the clouds of insurance obfuscation is a very difficult task. Just getting the company to break the funds into par and non par pools was a tough battle, it seems, before this could go into the Finance Bill. And my worry is that this battle is not over yet. Not only has the government given a three-year window to LIC to do this, but there is an exit door that allows the government to step back from this reform. There is a problem in pooling money the way it is done now. There is historic money pooled together (an old policyholder who gets 8% guaranteed return is paid out of the same pool that pays a new policyholder who gets a 4% return), but the money of two very different products (par and non par) are mixed up. 

The next concern is of the unions and the Left lobby inciting trouble over the IPO. We have seen what farmer-friendly laws can be whipped into by anti-reform lobbies. Although the government is doing this very carefully and slowly (keeping the sovereign guarantee in place, keeping the profit share in par policies at 90% and giving a glide path for splitting pools of money), there is a internal unwillingness for change. I fear that the 100% surplus handover in non par policies will be used by lobby groups to say how the government is ripping off poor policyholders. Of course, they will miss the point that these are non-participating policies. They do not get a share of the profits by their very nature.

What will help the government is the 10% of the issue at a 10% discount kept for policyholders. It remains to be seen how the LIC IPO narrative is built and how many steps back the government will have to take to bring this giant to market.

I will be tracking the LIC IPO closely. So watch this space.

Monika writes on household finance, policy and regulation.

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account, Financial Literacy, Investments, Money, Personal Finance | Tagged disinvestment, Finance Bill, government, IRDAI, LIC | Leave a reply

Opinion | Making sense of the business of life insurance

Posted on February 5, 2020 by monikahalan
Reply

The Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC) has been a partner of middle-class India for decades in building an annual saving habit towards a future corpus. Its army of agents provided doorstep service to millions of Indian investors at a time when there were few long-term corpus-building financial products in the country. But the feature of a monopoly, and that too owned by the government, is that it is slow to take note of change and upgrade processes and practices. The post-2010 Indian financial sector is very different from the 1980s and even 1990s with modern financial products and mark-to-market practices on equity, bond and loan valuations to ensure transparency and fairness. As of 31 March 2019, LIC managed almost 80% or ₹27.61 trillion of Indian household money in the life insurance sector, and had an annual premium book of just over ₹3 trillion in 2018-19, that’s about 66% of the total market. As this behemoth, also used by the government of the day to bail out its stock and bond paper, which carries a sovereign guarantee gets ready to list on the stock market, it is important that the business of life insurance is better understood by policyholders, investors and commentators.

Read more

 

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account, Financial Literacy, Let's Talk Money, Mint, Money With Monika | Tagged disinvestment, LIC, markets, policyholder money | Leave a reply

A little bit of IDBI Bank in my LIC policy

Posted on July 4, 2018 by monikahalan
Reply

For the more than 25 crore policyholders of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the LIC-IDBI Bank headlines are very upsetting. LIC will use up to ₹ 13,000 crore of policyholder money to buy up to a 51% stake in IDBI Bank, an asset nobody wants to touch. With stressed assets of ₹ 55,588.26 crore and bad loans a huge 28% of the total loan book, IDBI Bank is probably the worst of the bad banks of India. With its own paid-up capital at just ₹ 100 crore as on 31 March 2017, LIC will use policyholder money entrusted to it to make this equity investment.

LIC has been the gilt-edged long-term safety net for most of post-Independence middle India. “LIC kara lo” is a refrain heard in Indian homes the minute the first salary of the young adult of a family begins to come in. There is public anger when this security of savings comes under threat. There are lots of reasons the policyholders are worried. They are worried about the safety of their money—what if the entire money goes down the drain. They are worried about this being a precedent to more such toxic asset purchases. They are worried about the haste with which the insurance regulator has interpreted a rule to allow this sale—insurance firms are not allowed to hold more than a 15% equity stake in a single firm to prevent concentration of risk.

Read more

 

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account, Mint | Tagged IDBI Bank, IRDAI, LIC, LIC Policyholder, Nonpar Plan, Par plan, Ulip | Leave a reply

Regulators need to forget where they came from

Posted on October 2, 2013 by monikahalan
Reply

Expense Account, Mint

When I met the head of one of the largest private sector life insurance companies last week in Mumbai, he was clear that the 1 October 2013 deadline to re-engineer the traditional (money-back, endowment, whole life) plans in life insurance would at most be breached by two weeks to a month. (Market-linked plans, the unit-linked insurance plans, or Ulips, got a makeover in 2010). He said that most private sector companies he knew had their basic product suites in place and were ready to bring the new products to the market by 1 October. He said that the regulator had been working hard to approve at least one product in each category for every company in the industry. Mint Money spoke to several other private sector life insurance companies which said the same thing: we are ready. So what happened that the industry has been given a three-month extension when most companies were ready to go?

Read more

 

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account | Tagged Irda, LIC, mis-selling, monika, Personal Finance, RBI, regulator | Leave a reply

Should the ONGC issue bailout by LIC worry you, the policyholder?

Posted on March 7, 2012 by monikahalan
Reply

Expense Account, Mint

Last week’s bailout of the ONGC stake sale by Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC) has turned the spotlight on an institution that is a household name in India and now finds itself being publicly questioned over its investment decisions. Should you be worried about your money in government-owned LIC that was set up by an Act of Parliament and carries a sovereign guarantee? The guarantee gives policyholders the safety net they need in terms of a promised return of their money, but to contemplate a government payback of just over Rs 25 trillion (the sum assured on almost 300 million policies), in a situation where such a bailout is needed, would be quite a disaster. But let’s not think about that. It’s safer to stay with worrying about returns rather than the risk of a sovereign default.

Read more

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account | Tagged LIC, money, monika, ONGC, Personal Finance, policyholder money, questions | Leave a reply

It takes 4 zeros to cause a blowout

Posted on November 17, 2010 by monikahalan
Reply

Expense Account, Mint

This is a story that has been waiting to build scale, to add the four zeros it takes to gather the critical mass to declare something a scam, a bubble, trouble or just messy management. On Tuesday,Mint broke the story about the notional Rs 14,000 crore valuation deficit in three plans run by Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC) and about the Rs 120 crore loss in the LIC-sponsored LIC Mutual Fund (LIC MF). While the Rs 46,000 crore solvency margin money will take care of the insurance hole and protect policyholders’ interests, this is a good time to open up the mutual fund piece and take a close look at how that business is run. And to ask what the government will do to stop the localized problem from becoming systemic in the insurance company.

Read more

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account | Tagged agents, financial planning, LIC, LIC MF, Mint, mutual funds, Sebi | Leave a reply

Why should you plan for life after death

Posted on October 28, 2009 by monikahalan
Reply

Expense Account, Mint

Rs1,09,544 crore. According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), this is the money inunclaimed deposits in all scheduled commercial banks in India in 2007 . Add another Rs3,800 crore of unwanted money with the Employees Provident Fund. And several thousand crore more of unclaimed funds with the Life Insurance Corp. of India (LIC), for which I do not have any data, but expert estimates say it would be in four digits with a crore sitting comfortably behind. Why would somebody sweat away at work, stay away from kids, lose out on taking holidays and doing what they really loved, fight, scheme, machinate to get money under their belts and then die with all of it lying unwanted in some cold vault in the innards of the Indian financial system?

Read more

 

Share this:

  • Share on Tumblr
  • Tweet
  • Print
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Expense Account | Tagged estate planning, LIC, RBI, unclaimed deposits, Will | Leave a reply

Archives

  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • July 201

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Monika Halan's blog
    • Join 399 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Monika Halan's blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: